Skip to main content
My account
Menu
Your experience on PreventionWeb

Please help us improve PreventionWeb by taking this brief survey. Your input will allow us to better serve the needs of the DRR community.

See the survey

Published on
14 April 2020
Status
Completed

Ecosystems protecting infrastructure and communities

Expected duration
Jan 2013 - Aug 2017
SFVC commitment ID
20190307_002
Version
2.0
Author
Verónica Ruiz
Upload your content

Ecosystems Protecting Infrastructure and Communities (EPIC) is the first global initiative to promote the use of ecosystem-based approaches and protect communities from disasters and the negative impacts of climate change.

    Description

    IUCN’s mission is to influence, encourage and assist societies throughout the world to conserve the integrity and diversity of nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustainable.

    IUCN is uniquely positioned to tackle the multi-dimensional issues behind disaster risks and works to prove the value of nature-based solutions to reduce them. Its work integrates ecosystem management, livelihoods, community vulnerability, climate change adaptation and disaster management.

    Ecosystems Protecting Infrastructure and Communities (EPIC) is a global initiative to promote the use of ecosystem-based approaches and protect communities from disasters and the negative impacts of climate change. It also aimed to have ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction recognised in key global frameworks such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The project demonstrated the need to invest in ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction, to have more effective climate change adaptation in the targeted sites.

    The retained strategy combines 1) the generation of science-based knowledge, 2) implementation of ecosystem-based measures and 3) policy advocacy. Through the proposed science-policy-implementation approach the project 1) conducted vulnerability and capacity assessments in each target country, 2) provided capacity development and awareness-raising on Eco-DRR for local communities and decision makers, 3) implemented locally adapted ecosystem-based measures in selected locations, and 4) produced policy briefs and Eco-DRR approaches were mainstreamed in local and national policies and regulations.

    Did the Sendai Framework change or contribute to changes in your activities/organization? If so, how?

    In the past few years, there have been major policy advances that facilitated the uptake of integrated approaches for conservation, DRR, climate change adaptation (CCA) and mitigation. A key milestone for the disaster risk reduction field was the adoption of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. The Sendai framework places a stronger emphasis on the importance of ecosystems and therefore helped to gain recognition and scale-up our activities on ecosystem-based approaches for disaster risk reduction.

    What led you to make this commitment/initiative?

    What was your position before making this Voluntary Commitment / prior to the Sendai Framework?

    IUCN has a global presence and particular expertise in areas highly relevant to the disaster risk reduction such as: forest, watershed, marine and coastal management, environmental governance and human rights. The challenge for IUCN is now to build partnerships and provide nature-based solutions for disaster risk reduction (based on scientific evidence and socio-economic analysis) to build resilience to the impacts of climate change and reduce the frequency and severity of disasters. This commitment is a way for IUCN to reaffirm its engagement toward DRR and implementation of the Sendai Framework and to raise awareness on Eco-DRR approaches.

    Deliverables and Progress report

    Deliverables

    Deliverables are the end-products of the initiative/commitment, which can include issuance of publications or knowledge products, outcomes of workshops, training programs, videos, links, photographs, etc.

    Lessons learned and guidelines for implementation
    Intended date of delivery
    31 August 2017

    This pioneer global initiative - Ecosystems Protecting Infrastructure and Communities (EPIC) - promoted the implementation of ecosystem-based approaches for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation through five case studies in six countries. This publication provides a detailed description of the project’s operational approach and draws lessons from the case studies to inform and guide best practices to implement integrated ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR) and ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA).

    File
    epic_publication.pdf (5.23 MB)
    Link
    https://www.iucn.org/theme/ecosystem-management/our-work/environment-and-disast…

    Porgress report

    Progress date
    1 July 2020
    Summary

    The over-arching project goal of EPIC is that ‘ecosystem services are recognised, promoted
    and conserved as an integral part of disaster risk reduction policy, planning and
    programming in the six target countries and in key global processes such as the implementation of the Sendai Framework for DRR (Hyogo Framework for Action before 2015), and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (IUCN, 2012). It is concluded that the single most valuable contribution of the EPIC project has been the creation of awareness about ecosystem-based fro disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR)— both among communities and government officers
    — in the countries in which it was implemented. In this way, it brought together and worked
    with a diverse range of stakeholders. The benefits of ecosystem restoration compared to
    grey infrastructure for disaster risk reduction can only be assessed a posteori, after an
    extreme weather event.

    Achievements at a glance

    • Output 1: One common research and learning framework developed, and five case
    studies covering the target countries established and implemented.
    • Output 2: Tailored policy messages for seven countries and two international
    organizations, and one capacity building package developed.
    • Output 3: Seven multi-stakeholder dialogue (MSD) platforms, comprised of
    government, NGOs, civil society established in target countries, that use and
    promote nationally, and provide input into the findings of the project (IUCN, 2012).
    It is laudable that given its short duration, in general EPIC has been so successful in its
    policy advocacy.

    Organizations and focal points

    Implementing Organization(s)

    • International Union for the Conservation of Nature

    Focal points

    Main focal point
    Verónica Ruiz (Nature-based Solutions Programme Officer, IUCN)

    Explore further

    Sendai priorities
    Priority 1Understanding disaster risk
    Priority 2Strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk
    Priority 3Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience
    Priority 4Enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response, and to «Build Back Better», rehabilitation and reconstruction
    Sendai targets and indicators
    B-5Number of people whose livelihoods were disrupted or destroyed, attributed to disasters
    C-2Direct agricultural loss attributed to disasters
    C-6Direct economic loss to cultural heritage damaged or destroyed attributed to disasters
    D-1 (Compound)Damage to critical infrastructure attributed to disasters
    E-2 (Compound)Percentage of local governments that have adopted and implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies
    F-5Number of international, regional and bilateral programmes and initiatives for the transfer and exchange of science, technology and innovation in disaster risk reduction for developing countries
    Hazards Avalanche Drought and Desertification Flood Landslide Storm surge
    Themes Disaster risk communication Capacity development Civil Society/NGOs Climate change Community-based DRR Critical infrastructure Cultural heritage Preparedness Financing DRR Environment and ecosystems Food security and agriculture GIS and mapping Governance Human mobility Recovery Risk identification and assessment Science-policy-practice interface Social impacts and social resilience Earth Observation (EO) Water
    Country and region Burkina Faso Senegal Chile China Nepal Thailand
    Sustainable Development Goals SDG1: No poverty SDG2: Zero hunger SDG5: Gender equality SDG6: Clean water and sanitation SDG9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure SDG10: Reduced inequalitities SDG11: Sustainable cities and communities SDG13: Climate action SDG14: Life below water SDG15: Life on land SDG17: Partnerships for the goals
    Budget scale
    USD 1 million to < 5 million
    Scope
    National (or local) - Burkina Faso, Senegal, Chile, China, Nepal, Thailand
    Scale of beneficiaries
    1,000 to < 2,000
    Secured budget size
    100%
    Donors
    Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety
    X (Twitter)
    https://twitter.com/IUCN
    Videos
    Related links
    IUCN - EPIC project Website

    Is this page useful?

    Yes No
    Report an issue on this page

    Thank you. If you have 2 minutes, we would benefit from additional feedback (link opens in a new window).

    PreventionWeb is the global knowledge sharing platform for disaster risk reduction (DRR) and resilience.

    • Newsletter
    • Submit your content
    • Blog pitches
    • Submission and publishing policy
    • About PreventionWeb
    • Contact us

    Hazards

    • Avalanche
    • Cold Wave
    • Cyclone, Hurricane and Typhoon
    • Drought and Desertification
    • Earthquake
    • Epidemic and pandemic
    • Flood
    • Heatwave, extreme heat and heat stress
    • Insect infestation
    • Land subsidence
    • Landslide
    • Nuclear, biological, chemical (NBC)
    • Sea level rise
    • Technological hazard
    • Thunderstorm
    • Tornado
    • Tsunami
    • Volcano
    • Wildfire

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Oceania

    Themes

    Understanding & managing risk

    • Preparedness
    • Early warning
    • GIS and mapping
    • Data and information management
    • Risk identification and assessment
    • Small Island Developing States
    • Earth Observation

    Natural environment

    • Climate change
    • Environment and ecosystems
    • Food security and agriculture
    • Water

    Cross-cutting

    • Systemic risk
    • Recovery

    Human development

    • Capacity development
    • Children and youth
    • Civil society / NGOs
    • Community-based DRR
    • Cultural heritage
    • Gender
    • Human mobility
    • Inclusion
    • Social impacts and resilience

    Science, knowledge & advocacy

    • Disaster risk communication
    • Traditional and Indigenous knowledges
    • Science-policy-practice interface

    State, governance & economy

    • Financing DRR
    • Fragility and conflict
    • Governance
    • Insurance and risk transfer
    • Private sector

    Infrastructure & critical services

    • Critical infrastructure
    • Education and school safety
    • Health and health facilities
    • Structural safety
    • Urban risk and planning
    Loading