Document / Publication

  • Do more with your content!Discover PreventionWeb Services
  • Insuring public buildings, contents, vehicles, and equipment against disasters: Current practices of state and local government and options for closing the insurance gap
    https://www.preventionweb.net/go/74264

    Email sent!

    An email has been sent to the email addresses provided, with a link to this content.

    Thank you for sharing!

    OK

Insuring public buildings, contents, vehicles, and equipment against disasters: Current practices of state and local government and options for closing the insurance gap

Source(s):  RAND Corporation (RAND)

In this study, the authors contributed to the following question: In the USA, is the current allocation of risk between the different levels of government (federal, state, and local governments) is appropriate for managing disaster risk? The study then discusses several approaches for increasing insurance coverage for state and local governments and the trade-offs associated with them

Key findings 

  • A significant portion of state and local governments that are eligible for PA purchase some type of insurance for their BCVE.

State and local governments’ overall insurance share is low

  • FEMA pays for a substantial portion of their repairs.
  • The insurance share varies by the attributes of the incident causing the damage and of the public entity. For example, the insurance share is lowest for flood and earthquake, and the insurance share for midsized communities is higher than for either smaller or larger ones

The predominant view of experts consulted for the study was that the potential for FEMA assistance reduces insurance purchases by state and local government

  • For example, some entities buy only for facilities that they believe are critical to repair quickly and rely on FEMA to replace the rest. Others buy policies with lower limits or deductibles than they would otherwise. Responses were diverse, however, and some experts saw no evidence that the PA program affected the decisions of some entities.
  • There are numerous approaches to increasing state and local governments’ insurance coverage, and each approach has trade-offs. These approaches include encouraging credit rating agencies to evaluate communities’ financial preparedness for disasters, requiring communities to analyze their risks in order to increase their awareness of them, requiring communities to cover a substantial first layer of loss, and eliminating PA for BCVE.

Recommendations

  • Policymakers should consider the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to increasing state and local governments’ insurance coverage and consider how best to allocate risk between federal, state, and local governments. 



Add this content to your collection!

Enter an existing tag to add this content to one or more of your current collections. To start a new collection, enter a new tag below.

See My collections to name and share your collection
Back to search results to find more content to tag

Log in to add your tags
  • Insuring public buildings, contents, vehicles, and equipment against disasters: Current practices of state and local government and options for closing the insurance gap
  • Publication date 2020
  • Author(s) Dixon, Lloyd; Barnosky, Jason Thomas; Clancy, Noreen ; et al.
  • Number of pages 134 P.
  • ISBN/ISSN 9781977405425 (ISBN)

Please note:Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNDRR PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use