Our disasters, ‘their’ management: Need to break the chain of complacency and ‘not questioning’
The present state of disaster management in Bangladesh reflects both substantial progress and ongoing challenges. The government, guided by the Disaster Management Act (2012) and the National Disaster Management Plan (2021–2025), has strengthened legal and strategic frameworks to enhance preparedness, early warning, emergency response, and recovery systems at national and local levels. Institutional coordination has improved through mechanisms such as the Humanitarian Coordination Task Team, which brings together the Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief, UN agencies, NGOs, and other stakeholders to streamline response and planning. Community-based approaches, including the Cyclone Preparedness Programme and local disaster committees, play a central role in translating early warnings into lifesaving action, especially in coastal and rural areas. Investments in forecasting and hazard monitoring—such as enhancements by the Bangladesh Meteorological Department and flood forecasting systems—have also strengthened anticipatory action. Despite these advances, challenges remain in terms of resource limitations, infrastructure resili-ence, climate change impacts, and capacity gaps at subnational levels, underscoring the need for continued policy im-plementation, community engagement, and international cooperation to build long-term resilience.
The evidence and urge for consulting the local people on the preparedness mechanism is almost nil. The tendency of ignoring the native expertise and local wisdom to combat natural or complex disasters creates problems rather than strengthening the capacity of fighting back. People living in this land are not stupid people.
[...]
To make disaster management in Bangladesh more people-sensitive and responsive, greater emphasis is needed on community-centred and inclusive approaches rather than a predominantly top-down system. Local people—especially women, persons with disabilities, the elderly, ethnic minorities, and the urban poor—should be meaningfully involved in risk assessment, planning, and decision-making so that warnings, shelters, and relief reflect real needs and social realities. Early warning messages must be simplified, localised, and delivered through trusted channels and local languages to ensure last-mile reach. Strengthening local government institutions with adequate resources, trained manpower, and decision-making authority can significantly improve rapid response and accountability. Disaster shelters and recovery programmes should prioritise dignity, privacy, livelihoods, and long-term resilience rather than only emergency survival. Finally, transparent data sharing, feedback mechanisms from affected communities, and stronger coordination between government, NGOs, and community groups can help ensure that disaster management systems respond quickly, fairly, and with empathy to the people they are meant to serve.