You are in the STAGING environment

Document / Publication

  • Do more with your content!Discover PreventionWeb Services
  • Portland International Airport (PDX) resilient runway benefit-cost analysis

    Email sent!

    An email has been sent to the email addresses provided, with a link to this content.

    Thank you for sharing!


Portland International Airport (PDX) resilient runway benefit-cost analysis

Source(s):  National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS)

This study supports the Portland International Airport to study the long-term benefits of investing in a seismically resilient runway. Oregon has a significant potential in the next 50 years of experiencing an earthquake greater than magnitude-8.7 originating from the Cascadia Subduction Zone.

Such an earthquake will cause catastrophic damage and loss of life across Oregon and much of the Pacific Northwest from British Columbia to Northern California. This is a massive risk and a major vulnerability. However, mitigation investments before a disaster can reduce its impacts. With new investments in airfield infrastructure, the Port of Portland (Port) can play a crucial part in the region’s earthquake response and recovery.

The aim of the study is to help decision-makers build a mitigation strategy so they can protect lives, properties, and assets. The paper's mission is to provide the scientific data that may assist policymakers to develop effective federal programs that support pre-disaster mitigation and encourage more mitigation investments from the public and private sector.

Add this content to your collection!

Enter an existing tag to add this content to one or more of your current collections. To start a new collection, enter a new tag below.

See My collections to name and share your collection
Back to search results to find more content to tag

Log in to add your tags
  • Portland International Airport (PDX) resilient runway benefit-cost analysis
  • Publication date 2021
  • Author(s) Rose, A.; Santos, J.; Wei, D. et al.
  • Number of pages 113 p.

Please note:Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNDRR PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use