You are in the STAGING environment

Document / Publication

  • Do more with your content!Discover PreventionWeb Services
  • Disaster risk reduction in conflict contexts: The state of the evidence

    Email sent!

    An email has been sent to the email addresses provided, with a link to this content.

    Thank you for sharing!


Disaster risk reduction in conflict contexts: The state of the evidence

Source(s):  Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)
Overseas Development Institute (ODI)

This working paper reviews the state of the evidence on disaster risk reduction (DRR) in conflict-affected contexts. It is intended to stimulate a more explicitly political consideration of disaster and DRR studies, and to ‘reroot’ disaster studies in the political realm.

Consideration of DRR in conflict raises important questions about normative conceptions of and approaches to DRR, including the centrality of the state, the position of national DRR policies and institutions as the primary entry point for effective risk governance and the assumption that stability and peace are prerequisites for undertaking DRR.

The review identifies important gaps in the evidence which point to potential new directions in disaster–conflict research that simultaneously build on existing normative approaches, sidestep them and adopt new approaches and perspectives, and push the boundaries of current knowledge on the relationships and interactions between DRR and conflict.

Add this content to your collection!

Enter an existing tag to add this content to one or more of your current collections. To start a new collection, enter a new tag below.

See My collections to name and share your collection
Back to search results to find more content to tag

Log in to add your tags
  • Disaster risk reduction in conflict contexts: The state of the evidence
  • Publication date 2019
  • Author(s) Peters, Katie; Holloway, Kerrie; Peters, Laura E.R.
  • Number of pages 42 p.

Please note:Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNDRR PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use