You are in the STAGING environment

Document / Publication

  • Do more with your content!Discover PreventionWeb Services
  • Measuring individual disaster preparedness

    Email sent!

    An email has been sent to the email addresses provided, with a link to this content.

    Thank you for sharing!


Measuring individual disaster preparedness

Source(s):  Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich (CSS)

This Risk and Resilience Report provides an overview of recent individual preparedness research. The report discusses a broad variety of indicators that can help to measure individual disaster preparedness and explores the data availability of these indicators for Switzerland.

The report highlights existing gaps in the preparedness literature with regards to empirical evidence for the composition and effectiveness of emergency supply kits, as well as the specific challenges of suburban contexts.

Recommendations for future analyses include:

  • individual preparedness actions and public communication in the early phase of the ongoing COVID-​19 crisis to highlight the dynamics of disaster-related demand shocks;
  • an evaluation of smartphones’ potential for digitizing disaster preparedness tools, such as hazard maps, flashlights, radios and language translation apps; research into the positive and negative impacts of the sharing economy on access to cars, housing and tools during disasters; and
  • an ethnography of people that make individual disaster preparedness part of their identity and lifestyle, as well as their potential engagement for social innovation in areas such as emergency supply kits.

Add this content to your collection!

Enter an existing tag to add this content to one or more of your current collections. To start a new collection, enter a new tag below.

See My collections to name and share your collection
Back to search results to find more content to tag

Log in to add your tags
  • Measuring individual disaster preparedness
  • Publication date 2020
  • Author(s) Kohler, Kevin; Hauri, Andrin; Roth, Florian et al.
  • Number of pages 23 p.

Please note:Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNDRR PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use