Ensuring disability inclusiveness in a disaster preparedness program (EDUCEN project Istanbul case study experience)

14 July 2017
Author(s)

Ali Caglar Akgungor, AKUT Search and Rescue Association

How do we ensure that disaster preparedness messages reach all their intended audiences? How do we account for the needs of elderly people, children, people with chronic health conditions or disabilities for whom specific information could be very useful in emergencies and disasters? These are some of the questions the Turkish Search and Rescue Association (AKUT) sought to answer, as it undertook an innovative field action in Istanbul as part of the European Disasters in Urban Centers Project (EDUCEN) [1].

AKUT Search and Rescue Association is Turkey’s oldest and largest non-governmental, volunteer rescue organization with two main activities: The first is search and rescue following major disasters and outdoor sports accidents, while the second is disaster awareness raising [2].

The public awareness raising activity has become pivotal in the recognition of the issue of disability for AKUT. The volunteer trainers indeed realised that they were unable to answer questions from participants with disabilities about their special needs in disasters. AKUT volunteers thus challenged the “universality” of the disaster preparedness messages that they were disseminating.

For AKUT, the EDUCEN Project presented a unique opportunity to tackle this issue. The idea was to integrate the experiences, knowledge and skills of people with disabilities into the training content, as well as to detect any cultural pattern specific to different disability groups that could be instrumental in increasing their resilience. Naturally, this aim required the design and implementation of a collaborative, inclusive field action. In partnership with six NGOs, we reviewed the existing training modules and modify their content and format. Specific information concerning people with disabilities was added to it, thanks to feedbacks from our partners. The slideshow, as the core training material, has been simplified and multimedia adaptations such as audio descriptions, subtitles and sign-language translation videos, have been added. AKUT’s dissemination materials -notably, its disaster awareness booklet- have also been redesigned and made available online (including an audio version and a sign-language video version) for remote access.

As we progressed in the renewal of the training, we noticed that simplification and accessibility modifications have made our materials more useful not only for persons with disabilities, but also for children, the elderly, persons with minor sight or hearing impairments and persons with a low level of literacy. In other words, we had intuitively adopted the “universal design” concept, which perfectly suited our guiding principles: Ensuring maximum inclusiveness possible, supporting participation and promoting diversity. The accessibility solutions used in the new version of AKUT’s training presentation allows now the latter to be received by a larger and more diverse audience together, including people with disabilities [3].

We believe that the EDUCEN Project Istanbul Case Study has gone beyond a mere technical adaptation project and became essentially a learning process for AKUT on disability, and the lessons we have drawn are as important as the technical side of the action. To mention some:

  • People with disabilities are not necessarily dependent on others during disasters, and many are perfectly capable of assuming various roles in the disaster preparedness and management actions, provided that their special needs are met. Their systematic presence and commitment in the disaster management cycle is also necessary to incite people to change their perspective on disability.
  • Organizations need the life-knowledge (and support) of people with disabilities to become inclusive, which is only possible through integration and dialogue between equals.
  • Inclusion is not about empathy. It is based on the principle of equality between human beings. People with disabilities have the right to receive whatever services are offered to others, including those related to disasters.
  • Conveying information to people with disabilities, even in accessible formats, does not make a training program inclusive per se. Genuine inclusiveness happens when people with disabilities can take part in any section and/or any phase of the program by their own choice and assume any role offered to other volunteers.
  • Accessibility has several dimensions and forms depending on the context and the type of disability. There is no single “generic” accessibility solution. Persons with disabilities as end-users are the best guides on which tool to use. It is critical to take their input into account. Members of the Istanbul Case Study team, for example, came to realize that most of their ideas about accessibility tools and options were based on false assumptions.
  • Regarding accessibility, people with disabilities’ generally have realistic expectations depending on the context. As for the accessibility of training materials, the most efficient strategy is to aim for “usefulness”. For example, a visual element does not have to be orally described for people with sight impairments if it does not have informational value.
  • Finally, disability in disaster should not be considered apart from the issue of diversity in disaster. Just as with accessibility, there is no one-size-fit-all solution for addressing the needs of the whole human spectrum. Some need (and have the right to benefit from) tailored solutions. Planning for, integrating and implementing these solutions is the only way to make the DRR / DRM efforts truly inclusive.

We invite you to discover the details of the EDUCEN Istanbul Case Study (received “public service award” from the Accessible IT Platform of Turkey in May 2017) in the case study report and also to explore EDUCEN Handbook of Culture and Urban Disaster. 


[1] EDUCEN Project has received funding from EU’s Horizon 2020 Program, under Grant number 653874. The project was coordinated by Dr. Jeroen Warner from Wageningen University, Netherlands.

[2] AKUT’s seminar unit has undergone an important renewal in 2009, which increased its performance to an unprecedented level from 2010 onwards. 2012 has been a “record” year in terms of number of reached persons with 112.542 people in total. This figure has remained above 50.000 since then, which is a considerable achievement for a non-profit NGO. 

[3] In fact, our initial idea was to develop dedicated training modules for different disability groups. This option was discarded when one our partners rightly reminded us that such a design would isolate the participants with disabilities and lead to exclusion.


Caglar Akgungor has graduated from the Department of Political Sciences and Public Administration at Galatasaray University, Istanbul, Turkey. He holds a MA and a PhD degree in Political Science from the Grenoble Institute of Political Studies, University of Grenoble, France. His main research interests lie in the social and political dimensions of risk and disaster issues, risk perception, decision making and public policy making regarding emergencies and extreme events. Author of various scientific publications, including the first disaster sociology study of Turkey, Akgüngör works as a consultant on disaster management; he also teaches at Galatasaray University. Dr. Akgungor has led the development of an inclusive, disability-adapted public disaster training program in EDUCEN Project as the Istanbul Case Study coordinator, and currently focuses on diversity and disability in disaster risk management.

Share this
Attachments
Keywords
Country & Region

PLEASE NOTE: CONTENT IS DISPLAYED AS LAST POSTED BY A PREVENTIONWEB COMMUNITY MEMBER OR EDITOR. THE VIEWS EXPRESSED THEREIN ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF UNDRR, PREVENTIONWEB, OR ITS SPONSORS.
SEE OUR TERMS OF USE