Document / Publication

  • Do more with your content!Discover PreventionWeb Services
  • Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach

    Email sent!

    An email has been sent to the email addresses provided, with a link to this content.

    Thank you for sharing!


Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach

Source(s):  Copernicus Publications
European Geosciences Union (EGU)

This paper presents a first comprehensive qualitative and quantitative comparison of seven flood damage models, using two case studies of past flood events in Germany and the United Kingdom. Its objectives are to identify strengths and weaknesses in existing modelling approaches, specify the uncertainties involved and use these findings to assist the development of a harmonised European approach.

The paper concludes that care needs to be taken when using aggregated land use data for flood risk assessment, and that it is essential to adjust asset values to the regional economic situation and property characteristics. It calls for the development of a flexible but consistent European framework that applies best practice from existing models while providing room for including necessary regional adjustments.

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 3733–3752, 2012, doi:10.5194/nhess-12-3733-2012, Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Add this content to your collection!

Enter an existing tag to add this content to one or more of your current collections. To start a new collection, enter a new tag below.

See My collections to name and share your collection
Back to search results to find more content to tag

Log in to add your tags
  • Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach
  • Publication date 2012
  • Author(s) Jongman, B; Kreibich, H; Apel, H; Barredo, J. I; Bates, P. D; Feyen, L; Gericke, A; Neal, J; Aerts, J. C. J. H; Ward, P. J
  • Number of pages 20 p.
  • ISBN/ISSN 1684-9981

Please note:Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNISDR PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use