Researchers provide world-first platform to help understand how bushfire smoke harms the lungs and heart

Source(s): Hunter Μedical Research Institute (HMRI)

A team of researchers led by Professor Jay Horvat and Dr Henry Gomez have developed a world-first platform to define the impact of exposure to landscape fire smoke on the heart and lungs. 

The researchers found that short and long-term exposure to landscape fire smoke particulate matter (bushfire smoke) increased the hyperresponsiveness of airways and induced steroid-insensitivity in experimental asthma. 

They also found that short-term exposure to bushfire smoke decreased cardiac function and this is associated the expression of gene changes relating to oxidative stress and cardiovascular pathologies.  

The research was driven by the events of the 2019 and 2020 ‘Black Summer’ bushfires and funded by a Medical Research Future Fund grant.  

Professor Horvat explains, “Millions of people in Australia were exposed to unprecedented levels of particulate matter from landscape fires. This was associated with large increases in people having respiratory and cardiovascular symptoms. People with asthma experienced worsened disease symptoms and  had an increased needed to seek medical help as a result of exposure to particulate matter generated by the fires. Furthermore, the number heart attacks almost doubled in regional locations during the 2019/2020 black summer period”.  

The findings by Professor Horvat and Dr Gomez, published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, describe a world-first platform for understanding how landscape fire exposure affects heart and lung physiology. This research will be used to help identify therapies to protect people from the harmful effects of exposure.  

“Our research demonstrates that even small amounts of physiologically-relevant particular matter from landscape fire smoke has significant effects on lung and heart physiology, worsening key features of asthma and preventing mainstay suppressant medications from having much of an effect on symptoms,” says Professor Horvat.  

Professor Horvat says, “What our experience showed us during the black summer bushfires is that completely avoiding exposure to landscape fire particulate matter inhalation is almost impossible. Our research shows that exposure to even low amounts of landscape fire particulate matter over a short period of time has a significant effect on heart and lung function. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are required to protect people from the harmful effects of exposure, particularly for those that are at increased risk such those with asthma or cardiovascular disease. Better strategies for treating and preventing the harmful effects of landscape fire smoke exposure are going to become more important given that the prevalence and intensity of landscape fires is likely to increase globally as a result of climate change.” 

“Our findings show that particulate matter generated from different fuel sources have very similar effects at the same level of exposure. However, more research is required to determine how different levels of particulate matter generated from different fuel sources in different geographical regions and countries affect different populations of people, especially those with underlying respiratory and cardiovascular conditions. Furthermore, whilst our findings show that targeting airway smooth muscle contraction or oxidative stress pathways may provide novel strategies for the protecting against the effects of landscape fire inhalation on respiratory and cardiovascular disease, more studies are required to identify appropriate therapies” says Professor Horvat.  

This research was conducted in collaboration with the Asthma and Breathing research program led by Professor Peter Gibson and Professor Vanessa McDonald, and National Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellow from the HMRI Heart and Stroke program, Professor Doan Ngo.

View the study

Explore further

Hazards Wildfire
Share this

Please note: Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNDRR, PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use

Is this page useful?

Yes No
Report an issue on this page

Thank you. If you have 2 minutes, we would benefit from additional feedback (link opens in a new window).