Stop writing about Natural Disasters 

Stop writing about Natural Disasters 

A hazard can only become a disaster once it impacts on society or community. A hazard is natural, disasters are not.

Words matter. Describing disasters as natural suggests there is nothing humans can do to reduce disaster risk and mitigate their impact. Yet what turns a natural hazard into a disaster is often the consequence of human decisions that increase our vulnerability and exposure to risk.

While many hazards cannot be prevented, disasters can be. Earthquakes, droughts, floods, storms, landslides and volcanic eruptions are natural hazards; they lead to deaths and damages – i.e. disasters – because of what humans for or fail to do rather than an act of nature (UNISDR, 2010; Wisner et al. 2011).

Many disasters actually result from the combination of natural hazards and social and human vulnerability, including development activities that are ignorant of local hazardous conditions. The following two examples of disasters help elucidate this point.

"Over the last twenty years thinking about how to reduce disaster losses has greatly expanded beyond a simple focus on disaster management to consideration of all the other elements that contribute to increasing the risk of loss of life, injury, damage to critical infrastructure and economic losses when disaster strikes."

Mami Mizutori

A tale of two earthquakes

The Haiti earthquake in 2010 was particularly devastating due to the extensive damages caused to the built environment, which largely resulted from a low quality building stock and lack of enforced building standards. Structures were often informally constructed in an ad-hoc manner and some buildings were built on slopes with insufficient foundations or steel supports.

In contrast, the Chilean (Maule) earthquake that occurred one month after the Haiti earthquake was a higher magnitude (8.8.Mw) event but it killed far fewer people (525 deaths in Chile compared to approximately 160,000 -200,000 deaths in Haiti). This significant difference is commonly attributed to more sophisticated building codes in Chile that incorporate seismic design and the historic enforcement of those codes. A hazard becomes a disaster because its impact threatens the lives and livelihoods of people.

A disaster does not happen unless people and cities are vulnerable due to marginalisation, discrimination, and inequitable access to resources, knowledge and support. These vulnerabilities are further – intentionally or unintentionally – enhanced by deforestation, rapid urbanisation, environmental degradation, and climate change.

"Τhe key lesson is that disasters are social constructs. People are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and natural hazards due not just to their geographical context, but their financial, their social status, their cultural status, their gender status, their access to services, their level of poverty, their access to decision making, and their access to justice. Good development is good adaptation and it's good risk reduction."

Margaret Arnold

To summarise:

  • Describing a disaster as ‘natural’ suggests that, no matter the decisions taken by humans, the event would have occurred anyway and there was little we as humans could have done to prevent it, due to its natural origins.
  • The attribution of blame for disaster losses to nature, or to an ‘act of God’, absolves powerful decision-makers of responsibility for allowing or forcing people to live in vulnerable conditions.
  • This use of language strips disaster stories of their social, political, environmental and economic context – one where injustice is pervasive.
  • Additionally, there is no evidence currently suggesting that a reader’s understanding or interest in a story is undermined by simply using the term ‘disaster’, without the adjective of ‘natural’.

Journalists and other media professionals can play an important role in helping educate people and political leaders about the real nature of disasters and their causes so that policy decisions are taken that can mitigate future risk.

Banner on climate forecasting
Risk drivers
Learn more about the factors that may influence disaster risk.

More resources

Forest next to a city in Brazil
Resources to help you spread the word that it is in our power to ensure there are no natural disasters.

Latest updates on No Natural Disasters

Homeowners in front of their house after floods.
As the Victorian city of Echuca prepared for flooding this week, the council moved rapidly to build a temporary earthen levee as others sandbagged. This kept some homes dry, likely worsened flooding in others, and prompted blame from many sides.
Conversation Media Group, the
The ruined remains of a building after an earthquake
Youth and Young Professionals (YYPs) of CRRP has come together to try and explain that disasters are not natural; we should work on reducing our disaster risks - reduce existing risks and ensuring that no new risks are created.
Confederation of Risk Reduction Professionals
The authors argue that a discourse in which the role of human activity in disasters is clearly communicated will be more conducive to a proactive, equitable and ultimately successful approach to reducing impacts of disasters.

Is this page useful?

Yes No
Report an issue on this page

Thank you. If you have 2 minutes, we would benefit from additional feedback (link opens in a new window).