Document / Publication

  • Do more with your content!Discover PreventionWeb Services
  • The economic cost of the social impact of natural disasters

    Email sent!

    An email has been sent to the email addresses provided, with a link to this content.

    Thank you for sharing!


The economic cost of the social impact of natural disasters

Source(s):  Australian Business Roundtable for Disaster Resilience & Safer Communities
Deloitte Access Economics

This report looks at the costs and long-term social impacts of natural disasters in Australia, including those on health and wellbeing, education, employment and community network. This report uses three case studies from different regions and periods  - the 2010–2011 Queensland floods, the 2009 Victoria Black Saturday bushfires and the 1989 Newcastle earthquake - and assesses the tangible and intangible costs of the most recent two events.

The report finds the social costs of natural disasters in 2015 were at least equal to the physical costs, and it makes four key recommendations:

  1. pre-and-post-disaster funding should better reflect the long-term nature of social impacts;
  2. a collaborative approach involving government, business, not-for-profits and community is needed to address the medium- and long-term economic costs of the social impacts of natural disasters;
  3. governments, businesses and communities need to further invest in community resilience programs that drive learning and sustained behaviour change;
  4. further research must be done into ways of quantifying the medium- and long-term costs of the social impacts of natural diasters.

Add this content to your collection!

Enter an existing tag to add this content to one or more of your current collections. To start a new collection, enter a new tag below.

See My collections to name and share your collection
Back to search results to find more content to tag

Log in to add your tags
  • The economic cost of the social impact of natural disasters
  • Publication date 2016
  • Number of pages 116 p.

Please note:Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNDRR PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use