You are in the STAGING environment

Document / Publication

  • Do more with your content!Discover PreventionWeb Services
  • A how-to guide for subjective evaluations of resilience

    Email sent!

    An email has been sent to the email addresses provided, with a link to this content.

    Thank you for sharing!


A how-to guide for subjective evaluations of resilience

Source(s):  Building Resilience and Adaptation to Climate Extremes and Disasters (BRACED)

Subjective evaluations of resilience are growing in popularity. As evaluators grapple with the many conceptual and technical challenges faced in measuring resilience, subjective approaches offer a number of unique advantages.

Firstly, subjective evaluations capture bottom-up insights from those who matter most: people experiencing shocks and stresses on the ground. Secondly, they help reduce the burden of choosing hundreds of proxy indicators. Instead, people are asked to consider the factors that contribute to their own resilience and self-evaluate accordingly. Thirdly, subjective evaluations are often much shorter than traditional objective approaches. Not only does this mean that surveys are cheaper and quicker to administer, but also it opens up new possibilities for resilience data collection – including the option of administering them via mobile phone surveys.

While the advantages of subjective evaluations are increasingly clear, they are not without their own limitations. Difficulties in comparing across groups, personality traits and cognitive biases have to be considered. The good news is that many of these issues can be addressed using careful survey design.

This guide outlines what subjective evaluations of resilience are and how self-evaluations of resilience can be collected in a robust way, going through important steps needed in delivering a subjective survey, using the Subjectively Evaluated Resilience Score (SERS) approach as an illustrative guide. Most importantly, revealing a number of simple tips and tricks to ensure successful resilience evaluation based on lessons learned from the Building Resilience and Adaptation and Climate to Extremes and Disasters (BRACED) programme, as well as a number of other recent case studies.

Add this content to your collection!

Enter an existing tag to add this content to one or more of your current collections. To start a new collection, enter a new tag below.

See My collections to name and share your collection
Back to search results to find more content to tag

Log in to add your tags
  • A how-to guide for subjective evaluations of resilience
  • Publication date 2019
  • Number of pages 14 p.

Please note:Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNDRR PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use