You are in the STAGING environment

Document / Publication

  • Do more with your content!Discover PreventionWeb Services
  • Measuring, modeling, and managing systemic risk: the missing aspect of human agency

    Email sent!

    An email has been sent to the email addresses provided, with a link to this content.

    Thank you for sharing!


Measuring, modeling, and managing systemic risk: the missing aspect of human agency

Source(s):  International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

It is problematic to treat systemic risk as a merely technical problem that can be solved by natural-science methods and through biological and ecological analogies. There appears to be a discrepancy between understanding systemic risk from a natural-science perspective and the unresolved challenges that arise when humans with their initiatives and interactions are included in systemic-risk considerations. It is therefore necessary to investigate possible fundamental differences and similarities of systemic risk with and without accounting for human involvement. Focusing on applied and implementation aspects of measuring, modeling, and managing systemic risks, were identified three important and distinct features characterizing such fundamental differences: indetermination, indecision, and responsibility. It is affirmed that, first, including human initiatives and interactions in systemic-risk considerations must emphasize a type of variability that is especially relevant in this context, namely the role of free will as a fundamental source of essential indetermination in human agency. Second, it is postulated that collective indecision generated by mutual uncertainty often leads to the suspension or alteration of rules, procedures, scripts, and norms. Consequently, the associated systemic risks cannot be incorporated into explanatory models, as the new causal rules cannot be predicted and accounted for. Third, analogies from biology and ecology, especially the idea of ‘contagion,’ downplay human agency, and therefore human responsibility, promoting the false belief that systemic risk is a merely technical problem. For each of these three features, are provided recommendations for future directions and suggest how measuring, modeling, and managing approaches from the natural-science domain can best be applied in light of human agency.

Add this content to your collection!

Enter an existing tag to add this content to one or more of your current collections. To start a new collection, enter a new tag below.

See My collections to name and share your collection
Back to search results to find more content to tag

Log in to add your tags
  • Measuring, modeling, and managing systemic risk: the missing aspect of human agency
  • Publication date 2019
  • Author(s) Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan; Colon, Célian; Boza, Gergely et al.
  • Number of pages 17 p.

Please note:Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNDRR PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use