Monitoring and indicators
Measuring success in disaster risk communication through systematic data analysis.

Monitoring typically takes place at regular intervals (e.g. monthly or quarterly). If your project length and budget require, monitoring can be a one-off process (e.g. half-way through a project).

Depending on what you want to measure, you can gather data through surveys, focus groups, interviews and/or observation.

Collage on the checklist concept

Choose methods that fit your resources, audience and what you need to learn.

Surveys
Structured questionnaires to quantify knowledge, attitudes and behaviour change at scale.
Focus groups
Small guided discussions that surface how communities interpret and act on risk messages.
Interviews
One-on-one conversations for depth on individual decision-making and barriers.
Observation
Direct, in-context observation of behaviours the communication is meant to change.
Continuity icon

Feedback loops can also be used to gather monitoring data, though their primary purpose is to make iterative changes to content — whereas monitoring data is used to evaluate performance against objectives.

SMART indicators are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound.

GOAL :

The target population takes actions that reduce flood risk. The project can demonstrate that the changes it has brought about have helped people make better risk-informed decisions.

ObjectivesIndicatorBaseline

Month 1 (Target versus actual)
Midline

Month 12 (Target versus actual)
Endline

Month 24 (Target versus actual)
Verification method
Knowledge% of listeners report understanding risk information providedLocal quantitative evaluation (baseline/midline/endline)
Risk perception% of listeners are confident in their ability to to take action to reduce flood risk
Attitudes% of listeners who believe there is a real risk of flooding
Decision making% of listeners who report that the communication helps them to make better weather- related and risk- informed decisions
Practice/behaviour% of listeners who report taking a recommended action to prepare for heavy rainfall
Table 1: Example disaster risk communication indicators