Harmful information
Common challenges and practical recommendations

Advances in technology are enabling false information to spread at an unprecedented speed and scale.

In disasters, timely and accurate information saves lives. Yet the same conditions that make communication vital — confusion, fear, and uncertainty — also make it fragile. As situations evolve rapidly and emotions run high, disasters become fertile ground for information pollution. Misinformation and disinformation are now recognized as major global risks. The UN Global Risk Report* lists misinformation and disinformation as the top current global risk.

Misinformation and disinformation in disaster risk communication can significantly increase disaster risk by causing confusion and eroding credibility and trust in disaster risk management practices and disaster responses.

The UN Global Risk Report* lists misinformation and disinformation as the top current global risk.

For example, misinformation about the severity and timing of natural hazards can lead to delayed evacuations and inadequate preparations – or alternatively heightened stress and fear through unnecessarily alarmist content. Inaccurate reports about evacuation routes and shelter locations can lead to dangerous decisions around relocation. Misleading information about the extent of damage or aid availability can also hamper disaster recovery efforts.

Box 1. Common forms of harmful information in disasters

What drives harmful information in disasters?

  • Structural and information environment factors
  • Technological and platform dynamics
  • Human and cognitive factors
  • Deliberate creation and amplification by actors

Harmful information must be addressed before, during and after crisis.

Box 2. Artificial intelligence and harmful information in disasters

Responding to harmful information

  • Act quickly and keep a steady cadence
  • Lead with action, acknowledge emotions
  • Correct without repeating the falsehood
  • Leverage the crowd