Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2013
From Shared Risk to Shared Value: the Business Case for Disaster Risk Reduction


background image
214 Part III - Chapter 14
HFA reporting cycles (UNISDR, 2009

UNISDR. 2009.,Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction: Risk and poverty in a changing climate., United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction., Geneva,Switzerland: UNISDR.. .
; UNISDR, 2011

UNISDR. 2011.,Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction: Revealing Risk, Redefining Development., United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction., Geneva,Switzerland: UNISDR.. .
), problems of articulation and coordination exist between disaster risk management agencies, sector ministries and departments and local governments, compounded by lack of political muscle and technical capacities. As Box 14.2 highlights, there has been a major gap between development of policy and institutional frameworks and implementation on the ground (GNDR, 2011

GNDR (Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction). 2011.,If you do not join hands. Views from the Frontline. Local reports of progress on implementing the Hyogo Framework for Action, with strategic recommendations for more effective implementation., Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction. May 2011.. .
).
14.2
Attracting investment,
constructing risk
As governments need to attract domestic and foreign direct investment (FDI), the effective management of disaster risk can be compromised. This may be mainly a result of the current disconnect between investment promotion and risk management functions within their administrations.
Governments report difficulty in regulating investment and development in a way that reduces disaster risk; this should be examined more broadly.
Economic globalisation has been accompanied by radical changes in the role of the state in many countries. To maintain competitiveness and reduce financial risk, in some countries, welfare services and national industries have been privatised and state regulation has been reduced (Hobsbawm, 2011

Hobsbawm, E. 2011.,How to change the world. Tales of Marx and Marxism., London,UK: Little Brown/ Abacus.. .
; Loko et al., 2003; Rondinelli and Cheema, 2003

Rondinelli, D.A. and Cheema, G.S. 2003.,Reinventing government for the 21st Century. State Capacity in a Globalising Society., Bloomfield, CT,USA: Kumarian Press.. .
). Although this trend was briefly reverted at the outset of the global crisis in 2007 and 2008, pressure to deregulate and privatise services and infrastructure management in particular has now been renewed (GAR 13 paperGerulis-Darcy, 2012

GAR13 Reference Gerulis-Darcy, M. 2012.,Implications of the Global Political Economy on Vulnerability to Disasters: The Case of Long-Term Structural Adjustment Policies in Nicaragua., Background Paper prepared for the 2013 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction., Geneva,Switzerland: UNISDR..
Click here to view this GAR paper.
; Heise and Lierse, 2011

Heise, A. and Lierse, H. 2011.,The Effects of European Austerity Programmes on Social Security Systems., Modern Economy Vol 2: 498-513.. .
; Lapvitsas et al., 2010

Lapvitsas, C., Kaltenbrunner, A., Lambrinidis, G., Lindo, D., Meadway, J., Michell, J., Painceira, J.P., Pires, E., Powell, J., Stenfors, A. and Teles, N. 2010.,The Eurozone between austerity and default., RMF Occasional Report, September 2010.. .
).
Across many low and middle-income countries, structural adjustment programmes, and more recently, poverty reduction strategy papers (PRSPs) were used as vehicles to remove barriers to investment and growth; to reduce government spending; and to ensure debt servicing (Dollar and Svensson, 2000

Dollar, D. And Svensson, J. 2000.,What explains the success or failure of structural adjustment programmes?, The Economic Journal, 110 (october), 894-917.. .
; Easterly, 2003

Easterly, W. 2003.,IMF and World Bank Structural Adjustment Programs and Poverty., In: Managing Currency Crises in Emerging Markets of the National Bureau of Economic Research. M. Dooley and J. A. Frankel (eds.)., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.,. .
; Craig and Porter, 2003

Craig D. and Porter D. 2003.,Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: A New Convergence., World Development Vol.31, No. 1, pp 53-69.. .
). Consequently, state-owned enterprises were privatised and private investment and participation was encouraged in sectors such as health, education, pensions, banking, ports, airports and telecommunica-
(Source: Bank of Thailand, in: GAR 13 paperThampanishvong, 2012

GAR13 Reference Thampanishvong, K. 2012.,The Case of Thailand., Background Paper prepared for the 2013 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction., Geneva,Switzerland: UNISDR..
Click here to view this GAR paper.
)
Figure 14.4 Major sources of FDI into Thailand
Contact us  |  Disclaimer  |  Our Partners  |  References  |  Acknowledgements  |  PreventionWeb |  The Global Platform  |  © United Nations 2011.