• Do more with your content!Discover PreventionWeb Services
  • Bangladesh, Philippines, Myanmar, India, Viet Nam at highest economic risk from natural hazards – Global study

    Email sent!

    An email has been sent to the email addresses provided, with a link to this content.

    Thank you for sharing!


Bangladesh, Philippines, Myanmar, India, Viet Nam at highest economic risk from natural hazards – Global study

Source(s):  Verisk Maplecroft

Press release:

Some of Asia’s most important economies have the highest risk from the threat of natural hazards, due to the exposure of their cities and trading hubs to events such as flooding, earthquakes and tropical cyclones, according to the Natural Hazards Risk Atlas released by risk analysis company Maplecroft.

Bangladesh, the Philippines, Myanmar, India and Viet Nam are among the ten countries with the greatest proportion of their economic output exposed to natural hazards. In addition, they demonstrate poor capability to recover from a significant event, leaving domestic markets, foreign investments and supply chains open to severe disruptions.

“High exposure to natural hazards in these countries is compounded by a lack of resilience to combat the effects of a disaster should one emerge,” explains Maplecroft’s Head of Maps and Indices Helen Hodge. “Given the exposure of key financial and manufacturing centres, the occurrence of a major event would be very likely to have significant implications on the total economic output of these countries, as well as foreign business with interests there.”

The Natural Hazards Risk Atlas evaluates natural hazards risks across 197 countries. The online resource includes 29 risk indices and interactive maps that measure physical exposure to 12 different natural hazards, in addition to calculating overall economic exposure and socio-economic resilience to large events.

Strong resilience in big economies reduces economic recovery risks

Maplecroft identifies Japan, USA, China, Taiwan and Mexico as having the highest economic exposure to natural hazards in absolute terms. The ranking of these economic heavyweights comes as no surprise, especially in the wake of the costliest year ever for insurers. Economic losses for 2011 are estimated at US $380 billion by Munich Re, with the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan accounting for approximately 55% of the total.

However, huge economies such as Japan have the capacity to recover relatively quickly from natural disasters due to entrenched resilience factors including: economic strength, strong governance, established infrastructures, disaster preparedness and tight building regulations – factors that are, according to Maplecroft, largely ineffective in many of the emerging growth economies.

Economic fallout from natural disasters is highest in emerging economies

Bangladesh, the Philippines, the Dominican Republic, Myanmar, India, Viet Nam, Honduras, Laos and Haiti are the ten countries most at risk in Maplecroft’s Natural Hazards Relative Economic Exposure Index.

High levels of economic exposure, coupled with weak resilience, means that the fallout of a large natural disaster would be felt keenest in these countries. The resulting impacts in the Asian growth economies of Bangladesh, the Philippines, Myanmar, India and Viet Nam would not only include disruptions to the domestic economy, but also to the operations and supply chains of many of the world’s largest corporations who invest in these locations because of their significant growth opportunities.

Impacts in these exposed Asian countries are also heightened by their economic fragility. Some of the highest risk countries have substantial economic outputs, but they are fuelled by large, poor populations, many of which live on marginal land such as flood plains, leaving constituent workforces at heightened risk.

According to Maplecroft, these countries may take years to ‘bounce-back’ from an event on a similar scale to the Japan earthquake. A year after the fourth largest earthquake ever recorded the Japanese economy has returned to the economic output levels and growth forecasts seen prior to the event.

The impacts on countries with less resilience than Japan are evidenced by the 2011 floods in Thailand (ranked 32nd and high risk in the Natural Hazards Relative Economic Exposure Index), which not only wiped 9% off the country’s GDP, but damaged infrastructure, which is still not fully repaired nearly a year after the event. The floods also affected the operations and supply chains of multinational companies, with the automotive industry and ICT sectors being hardest hit.

Philippine floods and Indian drought highlight risks

Recent events serve to highlight the exposure of two of Asia’s highest risk countries. The Philippines, ranked second only to Bangladesh in the Natural Hazards Relative Economic Exposure Index, is still reeling from the effects of Tropical Storm Saolo, which caused extensive flooding across the capital Manila, cost up to 39 lives and forced 154,000 to evacuate their homes. According to Maplecroft, large sections of the Philippine economy are exposed to typhoons, volcanic activity, landslides, floods and storm surges; a fact reflected by the 274 recorded disasters over the last 20 years.

In addition, huge areas of India (ranked 5th in the Natural Hazards Relative Economic Exposure Index), are undergoing sustained drought, which is having a significant impact on agricultural outputs. Montek Singh Ahluwalia, India’s deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission, recently estimated that the drought will shave 0.5% off the country’s GDP, equivalent to approximately US$8.4 billion.

“As the global influence of emerging economies increases; the importance of their inherent natural hazard exposure will have wider and deeper global implications,” continues Helen Hodge. “The test for emerging and developing economies is to build a stronger capacity to meet the challenge of hazard prone environments. Failure to do so will risk their ambitious economic growth when the inevitable natural hazards strike.”

Add this content to your collection!

Enter an existing tag to add this content to one or more of your current collections. To start a new collection, enter a new tag below.

See My collections to name and share your collection
Back to search results to find more content to tag

Log in to add your tags
  • Publication date 15 Aug 2012

Please note:Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNISDR PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use