Sendai Framework Intergovernmental Expert Working Group


Contributions from Member State Experts and other relevant stakeholders

The present page contains inputs provided by Member State Experts and other stakeholders registered as participants in the Open-Ended Inter-Governmental Expert Working Group on Terminology and Indicators related to Disaster Risk Reduction. The inputs reflect the comments and suggestions of the participants on terminology and indicators related to the seven global targets of the Sendai Framework as well as proposed comments and suggestions to update the 2009 UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. The proposals take into account the two background papers prepared by UNISDR entitled “Proposed Updated Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction: A Technical Review” and “Indicators to Monitor Global Targets of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030: A Technical Review”.

Update in progress - contributions received by 30 September 2015 at 6 pm.

Member States
United Nations
Other Relevant Stakeholders

Member States - Guide Only

Comment on terminology Islamic Republic of Iran 2015.09.29
Comment on terminology: capacity and resilience The Netherlands 2015.09.29
Intervención de la delegación de Ecuador, Groupo de Trabajo Intergubernamental Sobre Indicadores para la implementacion del Marco de Sendai Ecuador 2015.09.29
Intervención de México en el Grupo de Trabajo Intergubernamental de Expertos de Composición Abierta Sobre Indicadores y Terminología relacionada con la reduccion del Riesgo de Desastres (RRD) Mexico 2015.09.29
Statement by the Republic of Kenya during the first session of the Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group on Indicators and Terminology Relating to Disaster Risk Reduction, 29th to 30th September, Geneva, Switzerland Kenya 2015.09.29
Japan - Contept note on Build Back Better Japan 2015.09.29
Terminology proposal from Japan delegation Japan 2015.09.29
Intervention from Japan afternoon of 29 September  Japan 2015.09.29
Terminology United Arab Emirates 2015.09.29
Comments on terminologies on DRR United Republic of Tanzania 2015.09.29
Intervention 1, 2 and 3 from Norway Norway 2015.09.30
Terminology: Possible alternative definition for resilience Australia 2015.09.29
Terminology: Possible definition disaggregation  Australia 2015.09.29
Russia's comments on Proposed Terminology Russian Federation 2015.09.29
 Comment on definition of Vulnerability Zimbabwe 2015.09.29
Another Comment from Zimbabwe on Target B Zimbabwe 2015.09.29
Comments about Indicators Madagascar 2015.09.29
Suggestions Concernant la Terminologie Madagascar 2015.09.29



UN - Guide Only


Intergovernmental - Guide Only


Other Relevant Stakeholders - Guide Only

Civil society statement on proposed indicators Civil Society 2015.09.30
Civil society statement and written input on terminology  Civil Society 2015.09.30
Presentation: inclusion - a challenge for disaster prevention Civil Society 2015.09.30
Suggestions for the conception of barrier-free disaster prevention in Germany Civil Society 2015.09.29
Inclusion - a challenge for disaster prevention Civil Society 2015.09.29