Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015
Making development sustainable: The future of disaster risk management


background image
103
Coupled with the limited availability of reserve funds, contingent credit agreements, insurance and access to emergency financing options, the limited investments in reducing existing risk and avoiding the creation of new risk mean that many SIDS in particular are characterized by high risks and low economic resilience. In the Indian Ocean, calculating risk in Madagascar, Mauritius, Comoros and Zanzibar (Figure 5.3) has been a first step in identifying the threshold of loss levels where countries would struggle to finance a recovery. In these countries, losses with return periods of 500 years would require resources equal to 7 to 18 per cent of GDP (GAR 13 paperWilliges et al., 2014

GAR13 Reference Williges, Keith, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Junko Mochizuki and Reinhard Mechler. 2014,Modeling the indirect and fiscal risks from natural disasters: Emphasizing resilience and “building back better”, Background Paper prepared for the 2015 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland: UNISDR..
Click here to view this GAR paper.
).
Countries with large budget deficits are usually unable to divert funding from revenues to absorb disaster losses and therefore need to use other mechanisms, including taxation, national and international credit, foreign reserves, domestic bonds, aid and risk financing instruments. Using all these financing mechanisms, Mauritius would still face a resource gap for any losses from
cyclone wind and earthquake with a return period of 62 years or over (Figure 5.4). The corresponding return period is only 24 years for Madagascar and 28 years for Comoros (Mochizuki et al., 2014

Mochizuki, Junko, Stefan Hochrainer, Keith Wil-liges and Reinhard Mechler. 2014,Fiscal and Economic Risk of Natural Disasters in Comoros, Mauritius, Seychelles and Zanzibar, CATSIM Assessment (Preliminary Result). Risk Policy and Vulnerability Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).. .
).
A limited ability to absorb losses can increase the indirect economic costs of a disaster and can slow recovery (UNISDR, 2013a

UNISDR. 2013a,Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction: From Shared Risk to Shared Value: the Business Case for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, Switzerland: UNISDR.. .
). For example, disruptions in the transport sector due to post-disaster reconstruction delays can impact on a range of other sectors, such as manufacturing and retail trade. However, access to ex-ante financing arrangements can prevent this problem (GAR 13 paperWilliges et al., 2014

GAR13 Reference Williges, Keith, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Junko Mochizuki and Reinhard Mechler. 2014,Modeling the indirect and fiscal risks from natural disasters: Emphasizing resilience and “building back better”, Background Paper prepared for the 2015 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland: UNISDR..
Click here to view this GAR paper.
). For example, assuming that post-disaster reconstruction financing were available in Cambodia 6 months to 1 year after a disaster,
3 access to ex-ante financing, such as contingent credit to facilitate more rapid recovery, would help stem the decline in economic output across a range of sectors, ranging from more than US$1 million in retail trade to almost US$6 million in the transport sector and US$7.5 million in manufacturing (ibid.).
(Source: UNISDR with data from CIMNE.)
Figure 5.3 Disaster risk in Zanzibar, Mauritius, Madagascar, and Comoros
Previous page Previous Section  
Contact us  |  Disclaimer  |  Our Partners  |  References  |  Acknowledgements  |  PreventionWeb |  WCDRR  |  © United Nations 2015.